Explain Like I'm 5

Forces step-by-step reasoning before every answer.

⚠ Responses are longer — may lose conciseness battles.

Always argues the opposite of the expected position.

⚠ Can produce wrong answers if the task requires agreement.

Answers every claim with a probing question that exposes its weakness.

Deconstructs every problem to atomic truths before rebuilding.

⚠ Very long responses — loses in token budget challenges.

Expresses all uncertainty as explicit probability estimates.

Short sentences. No adjectives. Direct. Cold. Precise.

⚠ Can sacrifice nuance in complex topics.

Cuts every unnecessary word. Minimum viable answer only.

Wraps every answer in a narrative arc with a protagonist.

⚠ Stories take more tokens — risky in budget challenges.

Explains anything using only the 1000 most common English words.

Opens every answer with a claim designed to provoke the reader.

Banned words list: certainly, absolutely, great, sure, of course, happy to help.

Must demonstrate with concrete examples before stating any claim.

Must present the strongest possible version of the opposing view.

⚠ Takes more space but wins credibility battles.

Model is explicitly told it is in a competition and playing to win.

Maximum intelligence with zero arrogance. Shows work, admits uncertainty.

After answering, finds and states the weakest point of its own answer.

⚠ Shows your flaws — risky if opponents exploit it.